Redovni brojevi | |||
Broj 1-2/2009 Tema: Savremena politička filozofija |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Sadržaj Rezimei Summaries Contents SADRŽAJ Uvodnik......................................................................................... 3
TEMA BROJA
savremena politička filozofija
Milica Vesković
Centralizovana monarhija ili slobodan savez: nedoumica
u okviru Kantovog projekta.................................................... 7
David Pupovac
Kantova teorija prava i pojam javnog.................................... 29
Miloš Bukumira
Fihteovo opravdanje države.................................................. 61
Tamara Popić
Rolsova i Pogeova koncepcija „prava naroda“
– uporedna analiza................................................................. 85
Dragana Tripković
Ernest Gelner i Entoni Smit: Dve ideje o nastanku
i budućnosti nacija............................................................... 127
Jelena Manić
Neki aspekti moralne analize savremenog kapitalizma..... 151
Bogdana Koljević
Rođenje mnoštva i moć biopolitike kod Harta i Negrija.. 173
Ogledi
Miroslav Jevtović
Skica za intelektualni portret Remona Arona................... 201
Jovan Ćirić
Kriza morala i korupcija...................................................... 233
Miroslav Svirčević
Proslava 150-godišnjice Svetoandrejske skupštine –
jedan neobeleženi jubilej...................................................... 253
Sučeljavanja
Milo Lompar
Titoizam i sekularno sveštenstvo....................................... 263
Đorđe Stanković
Istorijska nauka i politički sudovi................................... 287
Osvrt
Radoš Ljušić
Istoriografija odbira, srbofobije i jugofilije............... 303
Recenzije, prikazi
Ivan Milić
Objektivnost i relativizam
(Adam Svift, Politička filozofija)................................. 343
Vladimir Milutinović
Žižekova filozofizacija hrišćanstva
(Slavoj Žižek, Čudovišnost Hrista)................................. 347
Miroslav Svirčević
Omaž teoretičaru sukoba civilizacija
(Semjuel Hantington, Američki identitet)...................... 352
Saša Gajić
Protiv struje
(Mark Sedžvik, Protiv modernog sveta)............................... 357
Nemanja DŽuverović
Od religije do nasilja
(Mark Kurlanski, Nenasilje, istorija opasne ideje).......... 360
Željka Buturović
Bajka o racionalnom glasaču
(Bryan Caplan, The Myth of the Rational Voter)....................... 363
Slobodan Antonić
Ideološki izgovor za dominaciju
(Grupa autorkinja, Neko je rekao feminizam? Kako je
feminizam uticao na žene XXI veka).................................. 366
Contents......................................................................................... 373
Nspm
Beograd
Centralizovana monarhija
ili slobodan savez: nedoumica
u okviru Kantovog projekta
Sažetak: Republikanizacija, slobodan savez država i poštovanje hospitaliteta jesu uslovi koje Kant postavlja državama radi dostizanja mira. Drugi uslov, uspostavljanje slobodnog saveza država, jeste izvor mnogih nesuglasica Kantovih interpretatora. Ovi prikazi se kreću od zahteva za potpunom nezavisnošću država do zahteva za postojanjem supranacionalne vlasti. Osvrćući se na različitost prirodnog stanja država od prirodnog stanja pojedinaca, nepovredivost narodnog suvereniteta i neodvojivost etike od politike, autor pokušava da ukaže na pravu prirodu ovog saveza. Osnovni stav je da je ovaj filozof od nacija-država zahtevao da stupe u slobodnu federaciju u kojoj će njihov suverenitet biti u potpunosti očuvan. Samo u ovako shvaćenom savezu sloboda svakog pojedinca može ostati nenarušena, što je uslov da postignuti mir bude u skladu sa zahtevima uma.
Ključne reči: večni mir, slobodan savez država, centralizovana monarhija, prirodno stanje, društveni ugovor, um, sloboda, suverenitet.
Milica Vesković
CENTRALIZED MONARCHY OR FREE ASSOCIATION: DOUBTS ABOUT KANT’S PROJECT
Summary
Republicanization, free association of states and hospitality are Kant’s conditions that states have to meet if they want peace. Another condition, a free association of states caused many disputes among Kant scholars. Their interpretations range from full independence of states up to supranational authority. By looking into difference between the natural state of countries and natural state of the individual, inviolability of sovereignty of people and the inseparability of ethics and politics, I tried to point to the real nation of this association. It is my opinion that this philosopher wanted nation states to form a free federation in which their sovereignty shall be preserved. This is the only kind of association which can keep every individual’s freedom intact, and is necessary to harmonize the achieved peace with the requirements of the reason (Vernunft).
Key words: perpetual peace, free association of states, centralized monarchy, natural state, social contract, reason, freedom, sovereignty.
David Pupovac
Beograd
Kantova teorija prava i pojam javnog
Sažetak: Centralna tačka Kantove praktične filozofije jeste kategorički imperativ. Pored toga, njegovo određenje prava neizostavno prati i problem javnog, i to u dva smera – s jedne strane javno pravo koje je vezano za državu, a sa druge strane javnu upotrebu uma koja je usmerena ka državi, a pripada građanima. Oba pojma, javno pravo i javna upotreba uma, garantuju najveću moguću spoljašnju slobodu i jednakost građana. Cilj ovog rada jeste rasvetljenje pojma javnog izvođenjem iz samih principa praktičkog uma. Iako Kant nigde ne govori o ideji javnog, rad pokazuje da ovu ideju um nameće našoj praksi. Krajnji rezultat je da se čitava Kantova politička filozofija može interpretirati kroz pojam javnog, gde se poštovanje te ideje javlja kao nužan uslov pravednosti.
Ključne reči: javno pravo, privatno pravo, um, sloboda, etika, volja, htenje.
David Pupovac
KANT’S THEORY OF LAW AND THE CONCEPT
OF THE PUBLIC
Summary
The key point of Kant’s practical philosophy is categorical imperative. Apart from that, his definition of law is followed by the problem of the public, and it has two aspects – on the one hand, there is public law, which is associated with the state, and on the other, there is the public use of reason directed toward the state, and it belongs to its citizens. Both public law and public use of reason guarantee the highest possible level of external freedom and equality of citizens. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the concept of the public by deriving it from the very principles of the practical reason. Although Kant never speaks about the idea of the public, this paper shows that the reason imposes this idea on our practice. The final conclusion of this paper is that Kant’s political philosophy can be interpreted through the concept of the public, in which adherence to this idea is the necessary condition for justice.
Key words: public law, private law, reason, freedom, ethics, will, willingness.
Miloš Bukumira
Beograd
FIHTEOVO OPRAVDANjE DRŽAVE
Sažetak: Potreba za opravdanjem države proizilazi direktno iz Fihteovih spekulativnih stavova. Čovek, tj. ono Ja leži u osnovi svake misli, postojanja i svake vrednosti. Njegova suštinska i najveća vrednost na kojoj se gradi njegovo čitavo postojanje je sloboda.Sloboda je način čovekovog postojanja, jer se on i određuje preko svog slobodnog delovanja. Bilo koja država, da bi uopšte postojala, mora oduzeti deo prirodne slobode svakog svog građanina. Usled toga je državi potrebno opravdanje koje Fihte izvodi racionalnim objašnjenjem njenog postojanja. On to čini tako što dokazuje da čovek kroz svoju slobodu ostvaruje pravo na svojinu, što zahteva postojanje ugovora koji garantuje sigurnost svakom pojedincu. Tako nastaje država direktno iz potrebe uma, a sa ciljem uređenja pravnih odnosa među ljudima i njihovog napredovanja u kulturi prema slobodi.
Ključne reči: Fihte, čovek, sloboda, država, svojina, ugovor.
Miloš Bukumira
FICHTE’S JUSTIFICATION OF THE STATE
Summary
The necessity to justify the state comes directly from Fichte’s speculative attitudes. Man, i.e. his I, is the core of every thought, existence and every value. The essential and highest value of man, which is the foundation of his existence, is freedom. Freedom is a means of man’s existence, because he is determined through the freedom of his actions. In order to exist, every state has to deprive each citizen of part of his natural freedom. Therefore, the state needs justification for that, which Fichte does by giving a rational explanation of its existence. He does it by proving that man exercises his right of ownership through his freedom, which requires a contract which guarantees safety to every individual. That is how the state comes directly from the need of the reason and its purpose is to establish legal relations between people and to help them progress in culture toward freedom.
Key words: Fichte, man, freedom, state, ownership, contract.
Tamara Popić
Humbolt univerzitet
Berlin
Rolsova i Pogeova koncepcija
„prava naroda“ – uporedna analiza
Sažetak: U ovom radu izložena je uporedna analiza dvaju stanovišta međunarodne pravde i međunarodnih odnosa DŽona Rolsa i Tomasa Pogea. Osnovni predmet analize su Pogeove i Rolsove koncepcije „prava naroda“ kao koncepcije pravde za međunarodno društvo. Prvi deo rada bavi se ispitivanjem ključnih ideja Rolsove teorije međunarodne pravde izložene u njegovom delu Pravo naroda. Drugi deo rada posvećen je Pogeovoj kritici Rolsa i izlaganju temeljnih postavki njegovog shvatanja međunarodne pravde koja počiva na ideji institucionalnog kosmopolitizma zasnovanog na ljudskim pravima. Kroz ispitivanje njihovih stanovišta autorka izdvaja dva problema koja, prema njenom mišljenju, predstavljaju osnovni predmet spora između pomenutih filozofa. Prvi problem tiče se načina na koji liberalna demokratska društva mogu i treba da tolerišu društva čije se unutrašnje političko uređenje razlikuje od njihovog i opravdano je na temelju drugačijih filozofskih i političkih principa. Drugi problem tiče se međunarodne distributivne pravde i u okviru njega se razmatra u kojoj meri liberalni narodi imaju dužnost da pruže pomoć siromašnim društvima koja nisu u stanju da uspostave dobro uređene, pravedne institucije i obezbede dobrobit svih pojedinaca koji u njima žive. U svetlu Rolsovih i Pogeovih rešenja za ova dva problema autorka razmatra osnovne tačke njihovih shvatanja međunarodne pravde: njihovu odluku da za subjekta međunarodnog prava izaberu narod ili pojedinca, njihovo tumačenje ljudskih prava, kao i njihov odnos prema neliberalnim narodima.
Ključne reči: Rols, Poge, međunarodna pravda, tolerancija, međunarodna distributivna pravda, ljudska prava, kosmopolitizam.
Tamara Popić
Rawls’s and Pogge’s concept of the Law
of Peoples – a comparative analysis
Summary
This paper exposes the comparative analysis of two views of international justice and international relations, presented by John Rawls and Thomas Pogge. The main subject of the analysis is Pogge’s and Rawls’s conceptions of the “Law of Peoples” as the conceptions of justice for international society. The first part of the text examines the major ideas of Rawls’s theory of international justice exposed in his book The Law of Peoples. The second part of the text deals with Pogge’s critique of Rawls and expounds the main ideas of his version of international justice based on the idea of institutional cosmopolitism founded on human rights. Through examination of their views, the author distinguishes two problems which, in her opinion, present the main clashing point between the two philosophers. The first problem concerns with the way in which liberal democratic societies can and should tolerate other societies whose political system differs from their and is justified on the basis of different philosophical and political principles. The second problem deals with international distributive justice and examines whether the liberal peoples have a duty to help poor societies which are not able to establish well-ordered, just institutions and the well-being of all their members. In terms of Rawls’s and Pogge’s solutions for these two problems, the author considers the key points of their views on international justice; their decision to take individuals or peoples as subjects of international law, their interpretation of human rights, as well as their relation to the non-liberal peoples.
Key words: Rawls, Pogge, international justice, tolerance, international distributive justice, human rights, cosmopolitism.
Dragana Tripković
Beograd
Ernest Gelner i Entoni Smit:
Dve ideje o nastanku i budućnosti
nacija
Sažetak: Jedan od najvažnijih problema teorije nacije i nacionalizma jeste definisanje pojma nacije. Ovaj problem podstiče debatu o objektivnosti elemenata koje pojam nacije uključuje, kao i nedoumice povodom njegovog nastanka. Kao mogući odgovori nude se dve teorije. Teorija Ernesta Gelnera, koji je zastupnik modernističkog modela, drži stanovište po kojem je nacija proizvod uslova modernizacije, nešto što je nastalo i stvoreno, pa zato može i da propadne, tj. da bude prevaziđeno. Nasuprot njemu, Entoni Smit tvrdi da koreni nacije sežu u predmoderno doba, što implicira njeno postojanje i trajanje nezavisno od društvenih uslova.
Ključne reči: nacija, nacionalnost, etnicitet, modernizacija, nacionalni identitet.
Dragana Tripković
ERNEST GELLNER AND ANTHONY SMITH: TWO IDEAS ABOUT THE CREATION AND FUTURE OF NATIONS
Summary
One of the most important issues of the theory of nation and nationalism is how to define nation. This issue gives rise to a debate about the objectivity of elements included in the concept of nation and doubts about the formation of this concept. There are two theories which could answer these questions. According to Ernest Geller, a proponent of Modernity, nation is a product of modernization, something that was formed and created and can therefore perish, i.e. become outdated. On the other hand, Anthony Smith claims that the roots of nation can be found in Premodernity, which implies that it exists independently of social conditions.
Key words: nation, nationality, ethnicity, modernization, national identity.
Jelena Manić
Beogradska otvorena škola
Beograd
Neki aspekti moralne analize
savremenog kapitalizma
Sažetak: U ovom radu moralni status savremenog kapitalizma analizira se sa stanovišta utilitarističke, Kantove i Rolsove etičke teorije. Strukturni elementi poslovanja u kapitalizmu podvrgavaju se procenama usaglašenosti sa principom korisnosti, kategoričkim imperativom i principima pravde, naročito sa drugim principom. Dok je sa utilitarističke pozicije kapitalizam potpuno prihvatljiv, i sam predstavlja svojevrsno otelotvorenje utilitarističkog principa, dovodi se u pitanje opravdanost kapitalističkog sistema iz ugla druge dve etičke teorije. Analiza individualne motivacije i motivacije korporacija za ekonomsko delovanje, odnos teorije društveno odgovornog poslovanja i teorije zainteresovanih strana modernih korporacija, potom i pitanje ekonomskih sloboda, stavljaju se u kontekst razmatranja.
Ključne reči: kapitalizam, kategorički imperativ, lični interes, društveno odgovorno poslovanje, teorija pravde, teorija zainteresovanih strana modernih korporacija.
Jelena Manić
Some aspects of moral analysis of modern
capitalism
Summary
This paper deals with the moral analysis of the contemporary capitalism from the perspective of utilitarian and Kantian ethics, as well as from the perspective of the Rawls’s theory of justice. Compatibility of business structural elements with the utility principle, categorical imperative and theory of justice, is being assessed. Explicit adequacy between utilitarianism and capitalistic principles is presented, while such adequacy with other ethical theories is being inquired. Individual as well as corporative motivations for economic conduct on the market, socially responsible business and stakeholder theory of modern corporations, as well as economic freedom concept, are being analyzed in the framework of the paper.
Key words: capitalism, categorical imperative, individual interest, socially responsible business, theory of justice, stakeholder theory of modern corporations.
Bogdana Koljević
Nova škola za društvena istraživanja
Njujork
Rođenje mnoštva i moć biopolitike kod Harta i Negrija
Sažetak: U ovom članku autor razmatra teorijsku i praktičnu koncepciju biopolitike Antonija Negrija i Majkla Harta kako su izložene pre svega u delima Imperija (Empire) i Mnoštvo (Multitude). Analizirajući ideju o biomoći kao karakterističnoj za savremenu imperiju, autor se usredsređuje na pitanja paradigme rata i mira kao prostora biomoći, tj. na načine na koje se Fukoovo i sasvim drugačije Agambenovo razumevanje biopolitike prepliću u artikulaciji „mnoštva“ kao novog političkog subjektiviteta. U drugom delu rada eksplicira se ideja „biopolitičke proizvodnje“ kao konstitutivna za misao o „pozitivnoj biopolitici“. Autor argumentiše da na temelju razlike između Imperije i Mnoštva, odnosno razlike između mogućnosti demokratskog suvereniteta i opovrgavanja takve mogućnosti to predstavlja odlučujuće mesto susreta filozofskog i političkog kod Harta i Negrija i istovremeno mesto gde se pojavljuju najveći izazovi za njihov projekt.
Ključne reči: mnoštvo, biomoć, biopolitika, rat, mir, demokratija, suverenitet, pravo, savremeni diskurs.
Bogdana Koljević
THE BIRTH OF THE MULTITUDE AND
THE POWER OF BIOPOLITICS IN HARDT AND NEGRI
Summary
In this article the author considers the theoretical and practical conception of biopolitics in Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, as they are exposed first and foremost in Empire and Multitude. Analyzing the idea of biopower as a characteristic of contemporary empire, the author focuses on the issues of paradigm of war and peace as the space of biopower, i.e. on the ways in which Foucault’s and completely different Agamben’s understanding of biopolitics interwine in the articulation of the „multitude“ as the new political subjectivity. In the second part of the essay, the idea of „biopolitical production“ is explicated, as constitutive for the thought of „positive biopolitics“. The author argues that on the basis of difference between Empire and Multitude, i.e. the difference between the possibility of democratic sovereignty and dissmisal of such possibility, represents the decisive moment of encounter of the philosophical and political in Hardt and Negri and simoultaniously the space where the greates challenges for their project emerge.
Key words: multitude, biopower, biopolitics, war peace, democracy, sovereignty, law, contemporary discourse.
Miroslav Jevtović
Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
Beograd
SKICA ZA INTELEKTUALNI PORTRET
REMONA ARONA
Sažetak: Remon Aron je znameniti francuski mislilac druge polovine 20. veka. Kao duboki poznavalac društveno-istorijskih fenomena i, posebno, političke dinamike savremenog sveta, Aron je uveliko uticao kako na razvoj novije društveno-teorijske (filozofske i naučne) misli, tako i na oblikovanje glavnih obrazaca ideološkog mišljenja na „zapadnoj strani“ donedavno dihotomno podeljenog sveta. U radu su prikazani ključni momenti Aronove bogate intelektualne biografije i kritički su analizirani njegovi doprinosi filozofiji istorije, sociologiji i politikologiji kao liberalnom političko-ideološkom korpusu.
Ključne reči: Remon Aron, filozofija istorije, politička filozofija, politikologija, liberalno-demokratska ideologija, metodska skepsa, kritika, apologija.
Miroslav Jevtović
A SKETCH FOR THE INTELLECTUAL PORTRAIT
OF RAYMOND ARON
Summary
Raymond Aron is a notable late-twentieth century thinker. Being more than conversant with social and historical phenomena and political dynamics of the modern world, Aron had a great impact on modern social theory thought (both in science and philosophy) and on shaping the main patterns of ideological thought of the “western side” of the world which was until recently divided between two opposites. This paper presents key moments of Aron’s rich intellectual biography and gives a critique of his contributions to philosophy of history, sociology and political science, which form a corpus of liberal political ideology.
Key words: Raymond Aron, philosophy of history, philosophy of politics, political science, liberal-democratic ideology, method-skepticism, critique, apologia.
Jovan Ćirić
Institut za uporedno pravo
Beograd
KRIZA MORALA I KORUPCIJA
Sažetak: U ovom radu autor govori o tome kako je u poslednjih nekoliko godina došlo do vrlo izrazite krize morala kod mlade generacije. Prezentuju se rezultati mnogih istraživanja, sprovedenih u poslednjih desetak–petnaest godina među mladom populacijom u Srbiji, koji pokazuju da su sebičnost, hedonizam i individualizam postali najdominantnije moralne vrednosti, vrednosti koje su prihvaćene od najvećeg broja mladih ljudi. Nasuprot drugim, prosocijalnim vrednostima. Prema mišljenju autora, ovo nedvosmisleno vodi u kriminal svake vrste, a prvenstveno vodi u korupciju. S druge strane, prisustvujemo i krizi autoriteta uopšte, svojevrsnom skepticizmu i moralnom relativizmu, a što, kada je u pitanju sudstvo, obično ima vrlo nepovoljne posledice na pad poverenja u pravosuđe, odnosno dalje na širenje korupcije. Na sve to, prema mišljenju autora, nadovezuju se i problemi u vezi sa ratnim događanjima na prostorima bivše SFRJ, koji su produbljivali svaku vrstu krize, pa i moralne.
Ključne reči: kriza morala, sebičnost, individualizam, kriza autoriteta, korupcija.
Jovan Ćirić
THE CRISIS OF MORALITY AND THE CORRUPTION
Summary
There is a link between corruption and crisis of morality Here, there are presented some researches in which it is shown that the young generation has accepted in the last few years in Serbia some new moral values based on selfishness, individualism and hedonism. The new spirit of time promotes new values as something desirable and socially acceptable. All of that was promoted especially in the mass-media. The author in this text speaks also about the moral scepticism of the man in the twentieth century. There is a problem of crisis of the authority generally speaking, especially crisis of the authority of some very important social institutions, such as family, church, judiciary. In that sense the untrust in judiciary, the belief that judiciary is corrupted leads to the corruption. In the media there were, in the last few years, many texts and comments given by politicians and some experts, in which it was explicitily said that the judiciary was corrupted. That situation had very negative impact on the normal work of the judiciary. There are aslo some other factors that had and still have influences on the crisis of morality and the author mentioned some of them.Behaivor of politicians usually is the example for the others. It also has to be said that almost everything that so called international community did in the crisis of former Yugoslavia was the negation of justice and morality and had the negative impact on the crisis of morality in Serbia Ordinary people in many situations had the opportunity to see that the power is above the law.
Key words: crisis of morality, selfishness, hedonism, young generation, spirit of time, crisis of authority, corruption.
Miroslav Svirčević
Balkanološki institut SANU
Beograd
Proslava 150-godišnjice Svetoandrejske skupštine
Jedan neobeleženi jubilej
Sažetak: Rad je posvećen 150-godišnjici sazivanja čuvene Svetoandrejske skupštine u Srbiji, uz analizu njenog pravno-političkog sastava, rada i najvažnijih odluka i kritiku aktuelne srpske političke i intelektualne elite, koja nije na dostojan način obeležila ovaj izuzetno značajan jubilej za srpsku državno-pravnu povesnicu.
Ključne reči: Svetoandrejska skupština, knez, Savet, ustavobranitelji.
Miroslav Svirčević
CELEBRATION OF 150TH ANNIVERSARY OF ST. ANDREW’S DAY ASSEMBLY: AN UNMARKED JUBILEE
Summary
This paper is devoted to the 150th anniversary of St. Andrew’s Day Assembly in Serbia and gives an analysis of its legal and political structure, activities, the most important decisions and criticizes the contemporary intellectual and political elites of Serbia, which did not properly mark this anniversary, which bears great significance for the history of Serbian state and legislation.
Key words: St. Andrew’s Day Assembly, Knez (royal title), Council, Defenders of The Constitution.
Editorial ........................................................................................ 3
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE
contemporary political philosophy
Milica Vesković
centralized monarchy or free association: doubts about kant’s
project....................................................................................... 7
David Pupovac
kant’s theory of law and the concept of the public............... 29
Miloš Bukumira
fichte’s justification of the state.............................................. 61
Tamara Popić
Rawls’s and Pogge’s concept of the Law of Peoples – a comparative analysis 85
Dragana Tripković
ernest gellner and anthony smith: two ideas about the creation
and future of nations................................................................ 127
Jelena Manić
Some aspects of moral analysis of modern capitalism........... 151
Bogdana Koljević
the birth of the multitude and the power of biopolitics in hardt
and negri.................................................................................. 173
Studies
miroslav jevtović
a sketch for the intellectual portrait of raymond aron............... 201
jovan ćirić
the crisis of morality and the corruption................................... 233
miroslav svirčević
celebration of 150th anniversary of st. andrew’s day assembly:
an unmarked jubilee................................................................. 253
Polemics
Milo Lompar
Titiosm and secularist clergy..................................................... 263
Đorđe Stanković
History and political courts....................................................... 287
Retrospection
Radoš Ljušić
A historiography of selection, Serbophobia and Yugophilia..... 303
Rewiews
Ivan Milić
Objectivity and relativism
(Adam Svift, Politička filozofija)............................................... 343
Vladimir Milutinović
Žižek’s philosophization of Christianity
(Slavoj Žižek, Čudovišnost Hrista)........................................... 347
Miroslav Svirčević
Homage to a civilization clash theoretician
(Semjuel Hantington, Američki identitet).................................. 352
Saša Gajić
Against the current
(Mark Sedžvik, Protiv modernog sveta).................................... 357
Nemanja Džuverović
From religion to violence
(Mark Kurlanski, Nenasilje, istorija opasne ideje).................... 360
Željka Buturović
The rational voter fairy tale
(Bryan Caplan, The Myth of the Rational Voter)....................... 363
Slobodan Antonić
Ideological justification for domination
(Grupa autorkinja, Neko je rekao feminizam? Kako je feminizam
uticao na žene XXI veka).......................................................... 366
Contents......................................................................................... 373
|